PAGE2GO2 HOME | INTERNET NEWS

LeighExchange - Free Advertising Network Stock Research at Internet Speed Need Money Easy and Quick?

Re: Emontional Affair Update II

 List
Subject: Re: Emontional Affair Update II
Poster: Sarah Lister
Date: 23 Mar 2007 07:12:47 -0700
Related Postings: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196
On Mar 22, 7:30 pm, "WhansaMi" wrote:
> "Sarah Lister" wrote in message
>
> news:1174592650.088093.44430@e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Mar 22, 3:13 pm, "zorra" wrote:
> >> "La Mer" wrote in message
>
> >> > I"m not suggesting
> >> > to persecute the person who had the "affair", but with all due
> >> > respect, for the sake of even having a discussion, let's call it
> >> > what
> >> > it is, no?
>
> >> I'd love to. How about, "Developed an emotional connection"?
> >> Perfectly descriptive without bringing in an unnecessarily
> >> inflammatory, and IMO inaccurate term like "affair."
>
> > Personally, I'd vote for "crossed a line". I don't think that
> > developing an emotional connection is inherently bad, so I wouldn't
> > want to stigmatize that phrase - "developed an inappropriate emotional
> > connection" would be better but kind of long. I think the thing the
> > "emotional affair" phrase is trying to get across is that sex is not
> > the only line and that if you already have a secret emotional
> > relationship with someone you aren't about to cross a line (which is
> > the way some new posters see it), you already have crossed one. On
> > the other hand, many others clearly also believe that that second
> > level of transgression (actually having sex) is distinct from and
> > worse than the first so equating them by calling both situations
> > 'affairs' confuses things. Either way, if you're doing the
> > inappropriate-connection thing, you've entered the unfaithfulness zone
> > even if you're not at the very worst spot in that zone. So, crossed a
> > line.
>
> > Watching you guys discuss all of this has helped me clarify exactly
> > where the line is in my own opinion. I don't think there's anything
> > overwhelmingly wrong with feeling a connection or having a crush, but
> > if both people feel an attraction and they've acknowleged it to each
> > other but not to their spouses and are continuing to spend time
> > together, the line has been crossed, no matter how you want to
> > describe it.
>
> > Sarah
>
> Hey. Isn't this what I said yesterday?
>
>

Oh, sorry, maybe I even got the idea from you and didn't register it wasn't mine. I bow to your wisdom. :-)

Sarah

 

Page2Go2.com is not responsible for content of this message.